Compact mode

AVERAGEIF vs CEILING vs RAND

Table of content

Basic Classification Comparison
Usage Context Comparison
Basic Information Comparison
History Comparison
Facts Comparison

Usage Information Comparison
Technical Details Comparison
Evaluation Comparison
Ratings Comparison

Basic Classification Comparison

Function Category 📊

Primary classification of the Excel function based on its main purpose and usage domain, helps users quickly identify function types

AVERAGEIF

Statistical

AVERAGEIF belongs to the Statistical category. Excel functions for statistical analysis and calculations Click to see all.

CEILING

Mathematical

CEILING belongs to the Mathematical category. Excel functions for performing mathematical calculations Click to see all.

RAND

Mathematical

RAND belongs to the Mathematical category. Excel functions for performing mathematical calculations Click to see all.
Operation Type 🔧

Fundamental type of operation or action that the Excel function performs on its inputs

For all*

Calculation

Excel functions for performing various calculations

Usage Context Comparison

Basic Information Comparison

Known For ⭐

Distinctive characteristic or primary strength of the Excel function

AVERAGEIF

Conditional Average Calculations

AVERAGEIF is known for Conditional Average Calculations.

CEILING

Upper Rounding

CEILING is known for Upper Rounding.

RAND

Generate Random Numbers

RAND is known for Generate Random Numbers.

History Comparison

Creation Date 📅

Original release date of the Excel function

AVERAGEIF

Excel 2007

AVERAGEIF was created in Excel 2007. Functions first introduced in Excel 2007 release Click to see all.

CEILING

Excel 3.0

CEILING was created in Excel 3.0. Functions that originated in Excel 3.0 version Click to see all.

RAND

Excel 2.0

RAND was created in Excel 2.0. Functions introduced in the Excel 2.0 version release Click to see all.
Created By 👤

Organization or team responsible for developing the function

For all*

Microsoft Excel Team

Functions officially created by the Microsoft Excel development team

Facts Comparison

Interesting Fact 💡

Unique or lesser-known information about the Excel function

AVERAGEIF

Used over 1 billion times monthly

CEILING

Used in Scientific Calculations

RAND

Uses Wichmann-Hill algorithm from 1982
Sarcastic Fact 🤣

Humorous or ironic observation about the Excel function

AVERAGEIF

Makes statisticians feel superior with basic math

CEILING

Helps Numbers Reach Their Higher Self

RAND

The Las Vegas of Excel functions

Usage Information Comparison

Formula Complexity Level 📖

Indicates the difficulty level and complexity of using the Excel function effectively

For all*

Simple

Basic Excel functions for common calculations and tasks

Technical Details Comparison

Input Data Type 📝

Types of data that the Excel function accepts as input parameters

For all*

Number

Excel functions specifically designed for numerical calculations
Version Compatibility 💻

Indicates which Excel versions and platforms the function is compatible with < including Office 365< Excel 2019< 2016< etc.

For all*

Excel 2019

Excel functions that work specifically in Excel 2019 version
Excel 2016

Excel functions that work specifically in Excel 2016 version

AVERAGEIF

Excel 2013

AVERAGEIF is compatible with Excel 2013 Excel functions that work specifically in Excel 2013 version Click to see all.

RAND

Excel 2013

RAND is compatible with Excel 2013 Excel functions that work specifically in Excel 2013 version Click to see all.
Operating System 💾

Specifies the operating systems where the function can be used < including Windows< macOS< and web platforms

For all*

Windows

Excel functions optimized for Windows operating system
MacOS

Excel functions optimized for MacOS users
Web Excel

Excel functions available in web-based versions
Required Arguments Count 🔢

Number of mandatory arguments needed for the function to work properly

AVERAGEIF

2

AVERAGEIF needs 2 required arguments Click to see all.

CEILING

2

CEILING needs 2 required arguments Click to see all.

RAND

~
Required Arguments Type 📊

The data types accepted as valid input arguments for the function

For all*

Number

Excel functions that perform calculations specifically with numerical inputs

AVERAGEIF

Range

AVERAGEIF accepts Range as input types Excel functions that operate on cell ranges for calculations Click to see all.

Evaluation Comparison

Pros ✅

Key advantages and strengths of the Excel function

AVERAGEIF

Easy To Understand

Functions with clear and intuitive syntax that are simple to learn Click to see all.

Handles Basic Conditional Averaging

CEILING

Predictable Results

Engineering Friendly

Functions specifically designed for engineering calculations and analysis Click to see all.

RAND

No Arguments Needed

Excel functions that work without arguments provide quick results with minimal setup Click to see all.

Dynamic Updates
Cons ❌

Limitations and potential drawbacks of the Excel function

AVERAGEIF

Limited Condition Options

Single Criteria Only

CEILING

Limited To Upward Rounding

Single Direction

RAND

Not Truly Random

Changes Frequently

Functions that change often may require regular formula updates and maintenance Click to see all.

Ratings Comparison

Ease of Use Score 📊

User-rated score for function's ease of use

AVERAGEIF

8.5

User-rated score for function's ease of use (25%) Having high ease of use score means the function is more intuitive and user-friendly. Click to see all.

CEILING

8.5

User-rated score for function's ease of use (25%) Having high ease of use score means the function is more intuitive and user-friendly. Click to see all.

RAND

9.5

User-rated score for function's ease of use (25%) Having high ease of use score means the function is more intuitive and user-friendly. Click to see all.
Versatility Score 📈

Rating for function's adaptability to different scenarios

For all*

7
Performance Score ⚙

Rating for function's execution speed and efficiency

AVERAGEIF

9

Rating for function's execution speed and efficiency (25%) Functions with higher performance scores execute faster and use system resources more efficiently. Click to see all.

CEILING

9

Rating for function's execution speed and efficiency (25%) Functions with higher performance scores execute faster and use system resources more efficiently. Click to see all.

RAND

8

Rating for function's execution speed and efficiency (25%) Functions with higher performance scores execute faster and use system resources more efficiently. Click to see all.
Reliability Score 🛠

Rating for function's consistency and error handling

AVERAGEIF

9.5

Rating for function's consistency and error handling (25%) Functions with higher reliability scores produce more consistent results and handle edge cases better. Click to see all.

CEILING

9.5

Rating for function's consistency and error handling (25%) Functions with higher reliability scores produce more consistent results and handle edge cases better. Click to see all.

RAND

7.5

Rating for function's consistency and error handling (25%) Functions with higher reliability scores produce more consistent results and handle edge cases better. Click to see all.
Score ⭐

Overall rating combining all scoring attributes

AVERAGEIF

8.5

The overall score for AVERAGEIF is 8.5. Click to see all.

CEILING

8.5

The overall score for CEILING is 8.5. Click to see all.

RAND

8

The overall score for RAND is 8. Click to see all.

Alternatives to AVERAGEIF

Known for Text Search And Position Finding

Known for Finding Nth Smallest Value

Known for Counting Numeric Cells

📊 is easier to use than AVERAGEIF

📈 is more versatile than AVERAGEIF

⭐ is rated higher than AVERAGEIF

Known for Finding Nth Largest Value

Known for Multiple Criteria Counting

📈 is more versatile than AVERAGEIF

⭐ is rated higher than AVERAGEIF

Known for Basic Arithmetic Calculations

📊 is easier to use than AVERAGEIF

📈 is more versatile than AVERAGEIF

🛠 is more reliable than AVERAGEIF

⭐ is rated higher than AVERAGEIF

Known for Counting With Conditions

📈 is more versatile than AVERAGEIF

Known for Basic Statistical Calculation

📊 is easier to use than AVERAGEIF

📈 is more versatile than AVERAGEIF

⚙ performs better than AVERAGEIF

⭐ is rated higher than AVERAGEIF

Known for Lower Rounding

Known for Conditional Statements

🔢 needs fewer arguments than AVERAGEIF

📈 is more versatile than AVERAGEIF

⭐ is rated higher than AVERAGEIF